Skip to content

Conversation

@DarianM
Copy link
Member

@DarianM DarianM commented Oct 17, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the overall content in the technical article.

I think the order of content can be adjusted so the user has to know less things upfront, by using the flow only, and maybe moving the flow diagram towards the end to give readers a summary.

Also, maybe we should not link the repo structure too much with the article structure.

@DarianM DarianM marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 23:20
@DarianM DarianM force-pushed the darianm/article-redesigned-publisher-tools branch from a14e512 to 95add10 Compare December 2, 2025 09:15
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rename the files from 2025-10-17 and 2025-10-23 to 2025-12-02 - same as the publish date.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm waiting for Ioana to decide the publication date + approval

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants